Women bore a disproportionate burden during the ethnic cleansing of the Lhotshampa from Bhutan and the subsequent decades in refugee camps. Sexual violence by Bhutanese security forces was systematic and documented. In the camps, women faced sexual exploitation, domestic violence, and the collapse of social support structures. Widows and single mothers, many of whom had lost husbands to detention, torture, or killing, became heads of households with minimal resources.
The Bhutanese refugee crisis affected the entire Lhotshampa population, but women experienced distinct and compounding forms of violence, exploitation, and hardship at every stage — during the ethnic cleansing within Bhutan, during flight, in the refugee camps in Nepal, and during resettlement. The gendered dimensions of the crisis have been documented by Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the UNHCR, and academic researchers, though they have received far less international attention than the broader political narrative of the expulsion.
Sexual Violence During the Expulsion
Sexual violence against Lhotshampa women by Bhutanese security forces was not incidental but systematic. Human Rights Watch's 2003 report Trapped by Inequality documented numerous cases of rape and sexual assault committed by Royal Bhutan Army soldiers and Royal Bhutan Police officers during the crackdown in southern Bhutan between 1990 and 1993. Women were assaulted during raids on villages, at checkpoints, and in detention.
The violence served multiple purposes within the broader ethnic cleansing campaign. Rape was used as a tool of terror to accelerate the departure of Lhotshampa communities. Women who had been assaulted often faced social stigma within their own communities, compounding their trauma. In some documented cases, women were raped in front of family members as a deliberate act of humiliation and collective punishment. Security forces operated with complete impunity; no Bhutanese soldier or police officer has ever been investigated, charged, or punished for sexual violence against Lhotshampa women.
Women were also subjected to gender-specific forms of coercion in the denationalization process. Some were pressured to sign "voluntary migration forms" with threats of sexual violence. Women whose husbands had been arrested or had already fled faced particular vulnerability, as they lacked the social protection that male family members might have provided in Bhutanese society and had limited ability to navigate the bureaucratic apparatus being used to strip their citizenship.
Widows and Single Mothers
The crackdown in southern Bhutan produced a large population of widows and women who became de facto single heads of household. Husbands were killed in custody, died from injuries sustained during torture, disappeared after arrest, or were imprisoned for extended periods (as in the case of political prisoners like Tek Nath Rizal, who spent a decade in prison). Other men fled separately, leaving women to manage the departure and the journey to Nepal with children and elderly family members.
These women arrived in the refugee camps in Nepal with the full burden of family survival on their shoulders. Many had experienced direct violence themselves. They had lost not only their homes and country but also the social networks, extended family structures, and community institutions that had traditionally provided support. In the camps, they faced the enormous task of raising children in conditions of poverty, uncertainty, and dependence on international aid.
Conditions in the Refugee Camps
The refugee camps in southeastern Nepal — Beldangi, Goldhap, Khudunabari, Sanischare, Timai, and others — housed over 100,000 Bhutanese refugees at their peak. While the camps provided basic shelter, food, and education through UNHCR and partner agencies, conditions were particularly harsh for women.
Sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) was a persistent problem within the camps. A 2003 assessment by UNHCR and its partners documented high rates of domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation. Contributing factors included the breakdown of traditional social structures, the enforced idleness and frustration of camp life (particularly among men who had lost their livelihoods and social roles), overcrowded living conditions, and the widespread availability of locally brewed alcohol.
Women and girls were also vulnerable to sexual exploitation by individuals in positions of authority, including camp management staff and employees of humanitarian agencies. A 2002 investigation by the UNHCR Inspector General's office examined allegations of sexual exploitation by aid workers in the Bhutanese camps as part of a broader inquiry into exploitation in West African refugee operations. While the full scope of the problem in the Bhutanese camps was never definitively established, the investigation confirmed that the structural conditions for exploitation — power imbalances, dependency on aid, and inadequate accountability mechanisms — were present.
Access to reproductive healthcare was limited, particularly in the early years of the camps. Maternal mortality was a concern, and women had restricted access to contraception, prenatal care, and safe delivery services. Mental health support was minimal despite the high prevalence of trauma-related conditions among women who had experienced sexual violence, loss of family members, and forced displacement.
Education and Economic Constraints
While the refugee camps eventually developed educational infrastructure, girls and women faced particular barriers. Early marriage remained common as a survival strategy — families with limited resources sometimes arranged marriages for daughters at young ages. Women who had been heads of household for years in the camps had little opportunity for economic activity beyond small-scale informal enterprises, as Nepal's laws restricted refugee employment.
Despite these constraints, women played central roles in maintaining community cohesion in the camps. They organized mutual support groups, participated in community health programs, and served as teachers and community health workers. Women's organizations within the camps, supported by agencies including the Lutheran World Federation, provided spaces for collective action and peer support.
Resettlement Experiences
The third-country resettlement program that began in 2007 presented both opportunities and new challenges for women. On one hand, resettlement offered safety, access to employment and education, and legal protections that had been unavailable in the camps. On the other hand, women — particularly older women, widows, and those with limited formal education — faced significant difficulties adapting to life in countries such as the United States, Canada, and Australia.
Language barriers were often more severe for women than men, as women in the camps had had fewer opportunities for English-language education. Employment was typically available only in low-wage sectors. Single mothers faced the compounding challenges of full-time work, childcare, and cultural adjustment. Elderly women, many of whom had spent 15 to 20 years in refugee camps before resettlement, experienced isolation and loss of social status in their new environments.
Mental health professionals working with resettled Bhutanese communities have documented elevated rates of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder among women, linked both to the original trauma of expulsion and sexual violence and to the stresses of repeated displacement and cultural upheaval. The high suicide rate among resettled Bhutanese refugees — which drew national media attention in the United States — affected women as well as men, though men died by suicide at higher rates.
Legacy and Recognition
The gendered dimensions of the Bhutanese refugee crisis remain insufficiently acknowledged in both international discourse and within diaspora communities themselves. Cultural taboos around sexual violence have made it difficult for many women to speak publicly about their experiences. Diaspora advocacy organizations have increasingly recognized the need to center women's experiences in their work, but the primary focus of political campaigns has typically been on citizenship, repatriation, and state accountability in broader terms.
Efforts to document women's experiences have included oral history projects, community-based research, and reports by organizations such as Human Rights Watch. These records are essential not only for historical completeness but also for any future accountability or truth and reconciliation process, which must address sexual violence and gendered harm as central — not peripheral — elements of the ethnic cleansing.
References
- Human Rights Watch. "Trapped by Inequality: Bhutanese Refugee Women in Nepal." September 2003. https://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/nepal0903/
- Amnesty International. "Bhutan: Forcible Exile." 1994. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa14/004/1994/en/
- UNHCR. "Sexual and Gender-Based Violence against Refugees, Returnees, and Internally Displaced Persons: Guidelines for Prevention and Response." 2003.
- Shrestha, Nanda R., and Keshav Bhattarai. Historical Dictionary of Nepal. Scarecrow Press, 2003.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Suicide and Suicidal Ideation Among Bhutanese Refugees — United States, 2009–2012." Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2013. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6226a2.htm
- Refugee International. Reports on Bhutanese refugees in Nepal.
Test Your Knowledge
Think you know about this topic? Try a quick quiz!
Help improve this article
Do you have personal knowledge about this topic? Were you there? Your experience matters. BhutanWiki is built by the community, for the community.
Anonymous contributions welcome. No account required.