The Marriage Act of Bhutan 1980 is the principal legislation governing marriage, divorce, and marital property in the Kingdom of Bhutan. Enacted under King Jigme Singye Wangchuck, the Act codified customary practices including polyandry and polygyny while introducing restrictions on inter-ethnic marriages, particularly between Bhutanese citizens and foreign nationals. The Act has been criticised for provisions that disproportionately impacted Lhotshampa women and contributed to the broader denationalization of the southern Nepali-speaking population.
The Marriage Act of Bhutan 1980 is the primary legislation governing marriage, divorce, and related matters in the Kingdom of Bhutan. Promulgated by royal decree under King Jigme Singye Wangchuck, the Act represented the first comprehensive codification of Bhutanese matrimonial law, drawing upon both Buddhist customary practices and modern legal principles. The legislation addressed marriage registration, grounds for divorce, property division, child custody, and — most controversially — restrictions on marriages between Bhutanese citizens and foreign nationals.[1]
The Act must be understood within its broader political context. The late 1970s and early 1980s were a period of mounting concern within the Bhutanese government about the demographic balance of the country, particularly the growth of the Lhotshampa population in the southern districts. The Marriage Act's restrictions on inter-ethnic and international marriage were one component of a broader set of policies — including the 1985 Citizenship Act and Driglam Namzha — designed to regulate the ethnic composition of the population and reinforce a singular national identity.[2]
Historical Background
Prior to the 1980 Act, Bhutanese marriage was governed almost entirely by customary practice, which varied considerably by region and ethnic group. Among the Ngalop and Sharchop communities of northern and eastern Bhutan, marriage customs were influenced by Buddhist traditions and featured relatively flexible arrangements, including the practice of polyandry (a woman having multiple husbands, typically brothers) in some areas and polygyny (a man having multiple wives). Marriage was generally informal, solemnized by Buddhist rites rather than state registration, and divorce was relatively uncomplicated, often involving little more than the division of household property.[3]
Among the Lhotshampa of the south, marriage customs were rooted in Hindu Nepali traditions, featuring arranged marriages, dowry practices, and stricter prohibitions on divorce. The coexistence of these different marriage systems under one legal framework was a challenge that the 1980 Act sought to address, though its provisions ultimately reflected the cultural norms of the dominant Ngalop community more than those of the Lhotshampa.[2]
Key Provisions
Marriage Registration and Age Requirements
The Act established the legal framework for marriage registration in Bhutan. It set the minimum marriage age at 16 for both men and women, with parental consent required for those under 18. All marriages were required to be registered with the local court (Thrimkhang) within a specified period. The Act recognised both monogamous and polygamous marriages, reflecting the existing customary practices of Bhutanese society, though subsequent amendments and the 2008 Constitution have gradually moved toward a norm of monogamy.[3]
Inter-Ethnic and International Marriage Restrictions
The most controversial provisions of the 1980 Act concerned marriages between Bhutanese citizens and foreign nationals. The Act imposed significant penalties and consequences on such unions. A Bhutanese citizen who married a foreign national without government approval could face forfeiture of certain citizenship privileges and government benefits. Government employees who married foreign nationals were subject to loss of employment and benefits. These restrictions were applied with particular force to marriages between Lhotshampa Bhutanese and Nepali or Indian nationals — unions that were common in the southern border districts due to shared language, culture, and kinship networks.[2]
The inter-marriage restrictions were later reinforced by the 1985 Citizenship Act, which stipulated that a Bhutanese woman who married a foreign national would lose her citizenship unless she formally applied for retention, and that children of mixed marriages (where one parent was not a Bhutanese citizen) would not be entitled to citizenship by birth. The combined effect of the two laws was to create a powerful disincentive against cross-border marriages and to penalise those — overwhelmingly Lhotshampa — who had already entered into such unions.[1]
Divorce and Property Division
The Act established formal grounds for divorce, including mutual consent, adultery, cruelty, desertion, and incompatibility. Property acquired during the marriage was to be divided equally between the spouses, a provision that reflected the relatively egalitarian Bhutanese customary practice in which women could own and inherit property independently. The Act also addressed child custody, generally favouring the mother for young children while allowing judicial discretion based on the best interests of the child.[3]
Penalties for Bigamy and Adultery
While the Act recognised existing polygamous marriages, it introduced penalties for entering into new polygamous marriages without the consent of the existing spouse or spouses. Adultery was made a ground for divorce and could result in the adulterous spouse receiving a smaller share of marital property upon dissolution. These provisions represented a gradual move toward the regulation of marriage by the state, supplementing the customary practices that had previously governed domestic life.[3]
Impact on the Lhotshampa
The Marriage Act's impact on the Lhotshampa was severe and has been extensively documented by human rights organisations. The restrictions on inter-ethnic marriage, combined with the citizenship consequences imposed by the 1985 Act, created a situation in which Lhotshampa women who had married Nepali or Indian nationals — or whose husbands were reclassified as non-nationals during the 1988 census — faced the loss of their own citizenship and that of their children. Human Rights Watch documented cases in which women were forced to choose between their husbands and their citizenship, and in which children born to mixed-nationality couples were rendered stateless.[2]
The penalties for government employees who married foreign nationals disproportionately affected Lhotshampa civil servants in the southern districts, many of whom had married across the porous border with Nepal and India in accordance with longstanding community practices. These individuals faced dismissal from their positions, loss of benefits, and reclassification as non-nationals, contributing to the broader pattern of denationalization that culminated in the refugee crisis of the early 1990s.[4]
Subsequent Reforms
The Marriage Act of 1980 has been amended and supplemented by subsequent legislation. The 2008 Constitution affirmed the right to marry and found a family as a fundamental right, and the Marriage Act was substantially revised in later decades to align with constitutional principles. The Penal Code of 2004 criminalized marital rape and introduced stronger protections against domestic violence. The Domestic Violence Prevention Act of 2013 further strengthened protections for victims of domestic abuse. However, the citizenship consequences of marriage to a foreign national remain embedded in the nationality law framework, and the legacy of the 1980 Act's inter-marriage restrictions continues to affect Lhotshampa communities both in Bhutan and in the diaspora.[5]
Cultural Context
Bhutanese marriage customs are deeply rooted in Buddhist tradition and vary by region. In parts of western and central Bhutan, matrilocal residence (the husband moving to the wife's household) is common, reflecting the relatively high status of women in Bhutanese society. The practice of polyandry, while declining, persisted in some communities into the late 20th century. The concept of Gross National Happiness has influenced more recent approaches to family law, with the government framing marriage regulation as part of its broader commitment to social harmony and well-being.[3]
References
- Refworld. "Bhutan Citizenship Act, 1985." https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b4d620.html
- Human Rights Watch. "Trapped by Inequality: Bhutanese Refugee Women in Nepal." 2003. https://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/nepal0903/6.htm
- Wikipedia. "Marriage in Bhutan." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Bhutan
- WRITENET / Refworld. "The Exodus of Ethnic Nepalis from Southern Bhutan." 1995. https://www.refworld.org/reference/countryrep/writenet/1995/en/33123
- Constitute Project. "Bhutan's Constitution of 2008." https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Bhutan_2008
Help improve this article
Do you have personal knowledge about this topic? Were you there? Your experience matters. BhutanWiki is built by the community, for the community.
Anonymous contributions welcome. No account required.