Elderly Bhutanese refugees face acute social isolation in resettlement countries, having arrived with limited English, limited mobility, and few transferable skills into environments profoundly different from the agrarian Himalayan communities of their youth. The loss of traditional elder roles, dependence on younger family members, and cultural dislocation have produced widespread loneliness, depression, and a sense of purposelessness among the community's oldest members.
Elder isolation in the Bhutanese diaspora is among the most poignant and intractable challenges confronting the resettled Lhotshampa community. Elderly Bhutanese refugees — those who arrived in the United States, Australia, Canada, and other resettlement countries in their sixties, seventies, or older — occupy a uniquely vulnerable position. They carry the deepest memories of life in Bhutan before the expulsion, the longest experience of camp confinement, and the least capacity to adapt to the linguistic, cultural, and environmental demands of their new countries. For many, resettlement has meant exchanging the familiar deprivations of the refugee camps for a different but equally painful form of confinement: isolation within the walls of apartments in American cities where everything — the language, the climate, the food, the social norms, the pace of life — is alien.[1]
The isolation of elderly Bhutanese refugees is not merely a social inconvenience; it is a public health crisis with measurable consequences. Studies have linked social isolation among elderly refugees to elevated rates of depression, anxiety, cognitive decline, and suicidal ideation. The CDC suicide study found that older refugees were among those at highest risk, and subsequent research has identified isolation and loss of purpose as key contributing factors. Community leaders, healthcare providers, and resettlement advocates have struggled to develop effective interventions for a population whose needs — companionship, cultural continuity, meaningful occupation, a sense of being needed — are not easily met through conventional social services.
The Traditional Role of Elders
To understand the devastation of elder isolation in the diaspora, one must first understand the role that elderly people occupied in traditional Lhotshampa society. In the agricultural communities of southern Bhutan, elders held positions of authority and respect. They were the heads of extended family households, the repositories of community memory, the arbiters of disputes, and the keepers of religious and cultural traditions. Grandparents played central roles in child-rearing, transmitting language, stories, customs, and practical knowledge to younger generations. Their experience and wisdom were valued resources in a society that relied on intergenerational knowledge transfer for agricultural practice, religious observance, and social cohesion.
Even in the refugee camps in Nepal, elderly people retained a version of this role. They lived within extended family groups, participated in community life, spoke the dominant language, and contributed to household functioning in ways appropriate to their abilities. The camps were difficult, but they were culturally legible — the social structures, religious practices, language, and daily rhythms of camp life were familiar extensions of the rural Nepali-speaking world the elders had known. They were poor, they were stateless, but they were not lost.[2]
Resettlement and the Loss of Function
Third-country resettlement shattered the frameworks within which elderly refugees had maintained purpose and connection. Upon arrival in American cities, elderly Bhutanese refugees found that virtually none of the skills, knowledge, or social capital they possessed had value or application. They could not communicate — English was inaccessible to most, and the prospects for acquisition at their age were slim. They could not navigate — the built environment of American cities, with its cars, traffic signals, escalators, and sprawling geography, was disorienting and often frightening for people who had spent their lives in rural hillsides and camp compounds. They could not contribute economically — the labor market had no place for elderly workers with no English, no recognized skills, and often significant health limitations.
Most critically, they could not fulfill the social roles that had given their lives meaning. In resettlement, the extended family structure typically fractured. Nuclear family units were resettled as separate cases, often to different cities or states. Even when multiple generations lived in the same household, the dynamics of resettlement inverted traditional hierarchies. Children and grandchildren, who acquired English and cultural fluency more rapidly, became the household's interface with the outside world. Elders who had once been consulted for major family decisions found themselves unable to understand the conversations happening around them, dependent on younger relatives for translation, transportation, and interpretation of a world they could not independently navigate.
Daily Life and Confinement
The daily experience of isolated elderly Bhutanese refugees in American cities has been documented by researchers, community workers, and journalists, and the picture is consistent and bleak. Many elderly refugees spend their days largely confined to their apartments, particularly in cities with cold climates — Columbus, Syracuse, Burlington, Harrisburg — where winter weather adds a physical barrier to an already daunting set of obstacles to leaving home. They watch Nepali television programming or listen to Nepali radio when available. They may perform household tasks — cooking, cleaning, child-minding — that represent their remaining contribution to family functioning. They wait for family members to return from work or school.
Social interaction outside the family is limited. Without English, elderly refugees cannot engage with neighbors, shopkeepers, or service providers. Without personal transportation or the ability to navigate public transit, they cannot independently visit friends, attend community events, or access services. Without smartphones or computer literacy — though some have been helped by family members to use video calling to connect with relatives in Nepal, Bhutan, or other resettlement countries — they are cut off from the broader Bhutanese diaspora community. The isolation is particularly severe for elderly refugees who live alone or with only a spouse, without younger family members in the household to provide daily social contact.[1]
Health Consequences
The health consequences of elder isolation in the Bhutanese community are significant and well-documented. Depression is pervasive among isolated elderly refugees, manifesting in symptoms including persistent sadness, loss of appetite, sleep disturbance, withdrawal from available social interactions, and expressions of hopelessness about the future. Many elderly refugees articulate a specific form of existential distress: they feel they are living in the wrong place, that they have outlived their usefulness, and that they are a burden on their families. Some express a wish to return to Bhutan to die — even though the Bhutan they remember no longer exists in the form they knew it, and even though the government that expelled them has never offered a pathway for return.
Physical health is also affected. Social isolation is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease, cognitive decline, and premature mortality in elderly populations generally, and these effects are compounded among refugees by pre-existing health conditions, limited healthcare access, and the physiological effects of a lifetime of stress and deprivation. Elderly Bhutanese refugees face particular challenges in managing chronic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease, as language barriers impede communication with healthcare providers and understanding of treatment regimens.[2]
Community Responses
Bhutanese community organizations have developed a range of programs aimed at reducing elder isolation, though resources are limited relative to the scale of need. Community centers and cultural associations in cities with large Bhutanese populations organize regular gatherings for elderly refugees — often centered on shared meals, religious observances, or cultural activities such as singing traditional songs, sharing stories, and celebrating Hindu and Buddhist festivals. These events provide rare opportunities for elders to interact with peers in their own language and cultural context.
Some organizations have established home visiting programs, in which volunteers — often younger Bhutanese community members or American volunteers — make regular visits to isolated elderly refugees. Faith-based organizations, including Hindu temples and Buddhist centers that serve the Bhutanese community, have provided additional social infrastructure. Community gardens — where elderly refugees can engage in the agricultural activity that defined their lives in Bhutan — have been established in several resettlement cities and have proven effective at providing both meaningful activity and social connection.
Government-funded programs, including refugee elder services operated through the Office of Refugee Resettlement, have provided some assistance, but funding has been inconsistent and programs have not always been culturally adapted to the Bhutanese community's specific needs. Some Bhutanese families have responded to elder isolation by reconsolidating extended family households, with adult children moving to be near aging parents or bringing parents to live with them — recreating, to the extent possible within the constraints of American housing and employment patterns, the multigenerational household structure that supported elders in Bhutan.[2]
A Diminishing but Unresolved Challenge
The elder isolation crisis in the Bhutanese diaspora will, in the strictest demographic sense, diminish over time as the generation that arrived as elderly refugees passes. But the human cost of the crisis — the years of loneliness, purposelessness, and suffering experienced by thousands of elderly people who survived persecution, camps, and resettlement only to spend their final years in bewildered isolation — represents a dimension of the refugee experience that resettlement statistics and success stories do not capture. It is a reminder that resettlement, however necessary and beneficial in aggregate, imposes costs that fall most heavily on those least equipped to bear them, and that the measure of a resettlement program's success must include the wellbeing of its most vulnerable participants.
References
- Mitschke, Diane B., et al. "A Qualitative Study of Bhutanese Refugee Women's Health Promotion Challenges and Aspirations in the United States." Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, vol. 17, no. 4, 2015. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10903-014-0120-x
- Shakya, Pushpa, et al. "Social Isolation and Loneliness Among Older Bhutanese Refugees." Innovation in Aging, vol. 2, supplement 1, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igy023.1001
- UNHCR. "Resettlement of Bhutanese Refugees Surpasses 100,000 Mark." November 2015. https://www.unhcr.org/en-us/news/stories/2015/11/564dded46
Contributed by Anonymous Contributor, Syracuse NY
Test Your Knowledge
Think you know about this topic? Try a quick quiz!
Help improve this article
Do you have personal knowledge about this topic? Were you there? Your experience matters. BhutanWiki is built by the community, for the community.
Anonymous contributions welcome. No account required.