The Bhutanese Refugee Resettlement Programme was a multilateral initiative coordinated by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) beginning in 2007 to resettle Bhutanese refugees from camps in Nepal to third countries. Over the course of the programme, approximately 113,000 refugees were resettled, primarily to the United States, which accepted over 96,000. It became one of the largest and most successful refugee resettlement operations in UNHCR history.
The Bhutanese Refugee Resettlement Programme was a multilateral initiative led by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to resettle ethnic Nepali-speaking Bhutanese refugees — known as Lhotshampa — from protracted exile in camps in southeastern Nepal to third countries willing to offer them permanent residence. Launched in 2007 after nearly two decades of failed bilateral negotiations between Bhutan and Nepal, the programme ultimately resettled approximately 113,000 refugees to eight countries, with the United States accepting the vast majority. It became one of the largest and most successful third-country resettlement operations in UNHCR history.[1]
While the resettlement programme offered a durable solution for most of the refugee population, it was also controversial. Many refugees and advocacy organisations viewed it as a concession to Bhutan's refusal to permit repatriation — effectively rewarding the government for ethnic cleansing by relieving it of responsibility for the displaced population. The programme also left behind several thousand refugees who were unable or unwilling to resettle, and it did nothing to address the underlying question of citizenship rights or accountability for the expulsions of the early 1990s.[2]
Background
Between 1990 and 1993, over 100,000 Lhotshampa were expelled or fled from Bhutan as a result of the "One Nation, One People" policy, the 1985 Citizenship Act, the 1988 census, and the government's violent crackdown on the 1990 protests. The refugees settled in seven camps administered by UNHCR in the Jhapa and Morang districts of southeastern Nepal, where conditions were austere but stable.[3]
For nearly sixteen years, the international community pursued a repatriation-first approach. Between 1993 and 2003, Bhutan and Nepal held fifteen rounds of bilateral talks aimed at facilitating the return of the refugees. These negotiations produced almost no results. A joint verification exercise in 2001 examined a single camp (Khudunabari) and classified only 2.4% of its residents as bona fide Bhutanese citizens eligible for return — a result that the refugees and most international observers regarded as a farce. By 2006, it was clear that Bhutan had no intention of permitting large-scale repatriation.[2]
Origins of the Resettlement Initiative
In 2006, the United States announced its willingness to accept up to 60,000 Bhutanese refugees for resettlement, a figure that was later increased. This offer transformed the dynamics of the crisis. The UNHCR, which had long advocated for repatriation as the preferred durable solution, shifted its position and began actively promoting third-country resettlement as the most viable path forward for the camp population. Six additional countries — Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Norway, the Netherlands, Denmark, and the United Kingdom — subsequently agreed to participate in the resettlement programme.[1]
The first group of Bhutanese refugees departed Nepal for resettlement in the United States in March 2007. The programme was implemented through the International Organisation for Migration (IOM), which managed pre-departure orientation, health screenings, travel logistics, and initial reception in destination countries.[3]
Scale and Distribution
By the time the bulk of the resettlement programme concluded, approximately 113,000 Bhutanese refugees had been resettled to third countries. The distribution was as follows:[1]
- United States: Approximately 96,000 — by far the largest recipient. Major resettlement cities included Columbus (Ohio), Pittsburgh (Pennsylvania), Atlanta (Georgia), Syracuse (New York), Burlington (Vermont), Akron (Ohio), Harrisburg (Pennsylvania), and numerous other communities across more than 40 states.
- Canada: Approximately 6,500
- Australia: Approximately 5,500
- New Zealand: Approximately 1,000
- Norway: Approximately 570
- Netherlands: Approximately 330
- Denmark: Approximately 870
- United Kingdom: Approximately 360
The programme's milestone of 100,000 departures was reached in November 2015, making it one of the fastest and most comprehensive resettlement operations ever undertaken by UNHCR.[1]
Challenges and Controversies
Debate Within the Refugee Community
The resettlement programme was deeply divisive within the refugee community. A significant faction, organised under groups such as the Bhutanese Refugee Representative Repatriation Committee (BRRRC), opposed resettlement on the grounds that it undermined the right to return. They argued that accepting resettlement was equivalent to accepting Bhutan's position that the refugees were not citizens and had no claim to their homeland. Protests against resettlement took place within the camps, and some activists faced threats and intimidation for opposing the programme.[3]
Others — particularly younger refugees who had spent their entire lives in camps with no realistic prospect of returning to Bhutan — embraced resettlement as an opportunity to rebuild their lives. As the programme progressed and word spread of opportunities in the United States and other countries, resistance diminished and the pace of departures accelerated.[1]
Integration and Adjustment
Resettled Bhutanese refugees faced significant challenges in their new countries, including language barriers, cultural adjustment, unemployment, mental health issues, and loss of community cohesion. Suicide rates among resettled Bhutanese in the United States were alarmingly high in the early years, prompting the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to launch a targeted investigation in 2012. The study identified social isolation, intergenerational conflict, loss of identity, and the trauma of displacement as contributing factors.[4]
Over time, Bhutanese communities in the United States and other countries established cultural organisations, temples, community centres, and support networks. Many refugees achieved economic self-sufficiency, and the second generation has increasingly entered higher education and professional careers. Cities such as Columbus, Ohio — home to the largest Bhutanese community outside South Asia — have become active centres of Bhutanese diaspora life.[5]
Those Left Behind
An estimated 6,500 to 9,000 Bhutanese refugees remained in Nepal after the bulk of resettlement concluded. These individuals included elderly refugees unwilling to leave South Asia, those holding out for repatriation, individuals with complex legal situations, and people who missed or were excluded from the resettlement process. Their status remains precarious: Nepal has not granted them citizenship or permanent residency, Bhutan has not offered repatriation, and the resettlement pipeline has largely closed. Advocacy organisations including Bhutan Watch continue to raise their case at international forums.[3]
Legacy
The Bhutanese Refugee Resettlement Programme is widely cited as a model of successful large-scale resettlement, demonstrating that protracted refugee situations can be resolved through multilateral cooperation. At the same time, it is a deeply ambivalent legacy: the programme addressed the consequences of ethnic cleansing without addressing its causes. Bhutan has faced no meaningful international consequences for the expulsion of the Lhotshampa, and the question of citizenship, property restitution, and accountability remains unresolved. For many in the diaspora, resettlement was a new beginning, but the absence of justice for what was lost in Bhutan remains an open wound.[1]
References
- UNHCR. "Bhutanese refugees mark 100,000th departure for resettlement." https://www.unhcr.org/us/news/stories/resettlement-bhutanese-refugees-surpasses-100-000-mark
- Human Rights Watch. "Trapped by Inequality: Bhutanese Refugee Women in Nepal." 2003. https://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/nepal0903/6.htm
- Wikipedia. "Bhutanese refugees." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhutanese_refugees
- CDC. "Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Suicide and Suicidal Ideation Among Bhutanese Refugees." 2013. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6226a2.htm
- Wikipedia. "Bhutanese Americans." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhutanese_Americans
Test Your Knowledge
Think you know about this topic? Try a quick quiz!
Help improve this article
Do you have personal knowledge about this topic? Were you there? Your experience matters. BhutanWiki is built by the community, for the community.
Anonymous contributions welcome. No account required.